← Back to leaderboard
COL

Zakhar Bardakov

Colorado Avalanche C Age 25 ELC

2025-26· Data as of July 27, 2026

$868K AAV
1 Years Left
ELC Expiry

Status derived from CBA rules; edge cases (Group 6 UFA, 10.2(c), 35+ contracts) may be misclassified. Years remaining are not yet tracked.

45 Value Score
45th percentile among forwards
Verdict Full-season sample

Surplus value ~$1.1M/yr

$696K $2.1M
$868K Cap Hit 0.8% of cap
$1.9M Open-mkt value 1.9% of cap

Pending restricted free agent (RFA) His contract expires this season, but as a restricted free agent his current team keeps his signing rights and can match rival offers. This is a rating, priced in dollars — what the model rates his on-ice value at, not a forecast of what he'll sign for. See the projected signing price on the Free-Agent board.

Realizable today Entry-level rights let the team realize about −$27K of this as signable/tradeable surplus; the rest is locked-in cost control — real value the team enjoys but can't directly cash out while he's signed this cheap.

Availability adjustment −0% avg games played below league mean — see methodology.

Surplus value +$1.1M +1.0% of cap
Why this verdict

Why this verdict

Where this contract sits vs. the market

Each dot is a real free-agent signing (2015-2026): 1082 comparable forward deals. The line is the going rate at each talent level, the market convention we price against. Real signings scatter around it; comparable players don’t all sign for the identical number.

Pay, % of cap
← lower talent higher talent →
Cap hit $868K Market rate $2.0M +$1.1M vs. the open market

The page’s headline verdict, −$27K/yr, refines this by adjusting the market rate for age, contract term, and restricted-free-agent status. The plot compares to the raw market curve; the verdict adjusts it.

This player is on an entry-level contract. Part of the gap below the curve is CBA cost control (teams pay restricted players below open-market value by rule), not evidence of a market inefficiency.

Structurally similar active deals

This contract sits in the Young / bridge region of the contract map. These are the active contracts whose shape is nearest to it, closest in spend, term, age, and role (not how they aged):

Comparable by the shape of the deal, not by team or playing style. Archetypes are broad regions on a continuum; a deal near a boundary is genuinely in-between.

Reading this verdict

The range reflects pricing-model error, not measurement — fair value is a modeled estimate. The sample badge reflects games played, not dollar accuracy.

Outlook

Outlook

Aging Curve

In his peak window

Production index for forwards. The dot marks Zakhar at age 25.

Empirical production-by-age index (delta-method WAR fit, 2010-11+). Illustrative of typical aging; the dollar model prices age with a separate, softer decline.

0.250.500.751.0182226303437
Full stats

Full stats

Career xG IMPACT/60

Limited career 5v5 sample — a teammate-adjusted (RAPM) impact needs more ice time than this player has logged, so we don't show a point estimate yet. It appears once career 5v5 ice time clears the reliability floor.

Production

Counted outcomes — totals and rates that carry shooting and goaltending luck.

SeasonGPGAPTOI
2025-266019107.2
On-ice & expected

On-ice shot shares and modeled expected goals — these stabilize faster than goal totals, but xG is an estimate, not a count.

SeasonCF%xGxGF
2025-2654.73.515.3
CF%
Corsi-for percentage — share of shot attempts while on the ice
xG
Individual expected goals from the player's own shot attempts
xGF
On-ice expected goals — team's xG while this player is on the ice